XBT guide ยท updated 2026-11-15

Why XBT exists: keeping bitcoin money

Quick version

  1. XBT is the chain that kept enforcing BIP-110’s limits on non-payment data after August 8, 2026.
  2. Bitcoin Core v30 effectively uncapped OP_RETURN data by default. In our view, that works against bitcoin as money.
  3. Our position: XBT keeps bitcoin’s purpose. Ready to act? Secure your XBT.

Bitcoin was built to be money: peer-to-peer electronic cash. XBT exists because a group of bitcoiners refused to let the network drift into a general data store, and kept enforcing rules that said so. This page explains what happened and where this guide stands.

How to read this page: sections marked Our position are this guide’s opinion. Everything else is factual and linked to its source. Not financial advice.

1. What changed in Bitcoin Core v30

Bitcoin Core is the most widely used bitcoin node software. Version 30.0, released October 10, 2025, changed how nodes treat data in OP_RETURN outputs, the part of a transaction meant for small notes rather than payments:

These are relay and mining policy defaults, not consensus rules: nodes already accepted such transactions once they were in a block. The change came from pull request #32406. Bitcoin Core contributors explained their reasoning in a June 6, 2025 statement.

Sources: Bitcoin Core 30.0 release notes; Bitcoin Magazine, October 6, 2025.

2. Why many bitcoiners objected

Many node operators moved to Bitcoin Knots, an alternative node maintained by Luke Dashjr that keeps stricter filters on data. Per Bitcoin Magazine’s summary, their concerns were that the change signals data “spam” is welcome, that data use could fill limited block space and push up fees for ordinary payments, and that easy-to-parse data raises the risk of illegal content and legal pressure on people who run nodes. Axios reported in October 2025 that about a quarter of the network was running Knots, according to the Knots team’s own count.

Our position: v30 works against bitcoin as money

We think the v30 defaults were a mistake for a monetary network:

3. BIP-110 and the split

BIP-110, “Reduced Data Temporary Softfork”, was the filtering side’s answer. In its own words, its goal is to “refocus priorities on improving Bitcoin as money”. For a one-year deployment it would make these invalid, among others:

Coins created before activation are exempt from the new rules (“grandfathered”), so no existing coins could be frozen. It used a 55% miner signaling threshold and a mandatory-signaling window starting at block 961,632.

Miners didn’t go along. According to xbt.live’s history, miner signaling peaked around 2.5% of blocks, and at block 961,632 on August 8, 2026 nearly all hashpower stayed on the old rules. That chain trades as BTC. The BIP-110 chain continued with very little hashpower, and on August 30, 2026, at block 961,640, it switched its mining to BLAKE2b, according to BitcoinBIP110.org. That chain is XBT. Both chains share all history before the split.

Sources: BIP-110 (the BIP repository now lists its status as Closed); bitcoindev mailing-list discussion; xbt.live history (updated 2026-10-05); BitcoinBIP110.org PSA-260902.

4. Our position: reclaim real bitcoin

We believe XBT is the chain that kept bitcoin’s purpose: the same coin history and rules that put payments first. Calling it “real bitcoin” is our view, and plenty of people disagree. But money is what its users choose, and we choose the chain that treats bitcoin as money.

What Core supporters say

In fairness: Bitcoin Core contributors argue that policy filters don’t stop data that pays fees, because users and miners can work directly together, and that refusing to relay transactions miners will mine anyway pushes users toward private submission channels that favor large miners. They say node software should predict what goes into the next block rather than police consenting users, and that this is “not endorsing or condoning non-financial data usage” but accepting that a censorship-resistant system “can and will be used for use cases not everyone agrees on” (Bitcoin Core statement). Critics of XBT also point out that the BTC chain kept nearly all of the hashpower and that XBT’s new proof of work is far less tested (xbt.live history). Read both sides and decide for yourself.

Ready? Get your XBT into your own wallet →

← Safety checklist Next: Mesh networks → Back to Start here

Not financial or tax advice. This guide is education only. Splitting, selling or trading fork coins may be a taxable event where you live; talk to a tax professional. The XBT wallets and firmware mentioned are new, community-built and unaudited. Test with small amounts; you are responsible for your own keys. We never ask for seeds, keys or money. See sources.